Why pressure is the lever
On an ageing reticulation network — which describes much of South Africa's infrastructure — pressure does two expensive things. First, it drives background leakage: every weeping joint and small crack loses more water the harder you push it. Second, it drives bursts: high pressure, and especially rapid pressure swings (transients), fatigue old pipes until they fail. The important part is that the relationship is non-linear — reducing pressure cuts leakage and burst frequency by more than you'd expect from the percentage drop. That's why pressure management is consistently one of the best-value interventions in any non-revenue-water programme.
The night-time clue: pressure is usually highest when demand is lowest — overnight. That's exactly when leakage and burst risk peak, and exactly the window most networks never see because no one is watching. Continuous pressure monitoring turns that blind spot into your biggest saving.
What "managing pressure" actually means
- Monitor by zone. Pressure loggers across district metering areas (DMAs) reveal the real pressure profile of each zone, including the night peak and any transients.
- Reduce where it's too high. Pressure-reducing valves (PRVs) hold a zone at a target pressure. The best results come from modulated control — varying the setpoint by time of day or by flow — so you keep just enough pressure for service and no more.
- Tame transients. Smooth, controlled pressure (avoiding sudden surges from pump starts and valve operations) extends pipe life as much as the average reduction does.
- Protect service. The goal is the minimum pressure that still delivers acceptable service to the highest or furthest connection — managed down carefully, not blindly cut.
How much leakage a pressure reduction buys
Leakage varies with pressure to a power (the N1 exponent) that depends on pipe material and leak type — which is why the same pressure cut buys different results on different networks:
| Network character | Typical N1 | Leakage change for a 20% pressure cut | Burst frequency effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rigid pipes, fixed-area leaks (steel, cast iron) | ~0.5 | ~10% reduction | Strong — bursts fall faster than leakage |
| Mixed materials, mixed leaks | ~1.0 | ~20% reduction | Strong |
| Flexible pipes, variable-area leaks (uPVC, HDPE, joints) | ~1.5 | ~28% reduction | Strongest |
| Background leakage (many tiny paths) | ~1.5 | ~28% reduction | — |
The practical reading: on the old mixed-material networks most South African municipalities run, a modest night-time pressure reduction typically cuts leakage roughly in proportion and cuts bursts disproportionately more — the burst effect is where the maintenance budget feels it first.